>
Just the job.
>
Opel builds cars that not many people want to buy.
Being part of General Motors doesn’t help, but they’re marginally (if that) profitable at the best of times.
They now want to go it alone and they pretty much said to the Government last week that “they need €3bn”.
Of my money.
Didn’t anyone teach them to say “Please”?
Not “Could we please have €3bn”
No.
We WANT….
Lack of parental guidance, if you ask me.
But that would be GM, wouldn’t it?
The same company that flew into Washington without a business plan and asked for $12bn?
Thought so.
>
One says to the other: “What the £$%* do you think you’re locking at”
Search engines are funny things.
Google “sexy bums” and a post I wrote back in October last year titled “Don’t ask me … (about sexy bums)” is ranked 10th.
It’s the consistently most viewed post I’ve ever written, along with “Rick Danko and Levon Helm” (which incidentally ranks #1 on Google.)
Let’s see how popular this one gets….
>
Given that I once achieved a certain notoriety with a single digit percentage mark in a maths exam (my story: it was a bet to see who could get the lowest mark by giving obviously wrong answers, whilst avoiding 0%…), you wouldn’t expect me to try and explain this.
Wired Magazine, however, does a excellent job of explaining what triggered the economic meltdown.
Apart from greed, that is…
>
Met MMTP (My Mate The Professor) for lunch the other day.
We were talking about cerebral stuff as you have to do with professors – moaning about the wives, discussing ailments, getting pissed – and we got onto the topic of kickstarting the economy by incenting people to buy new cars.
“What’s the average price of a new smallish car” he asked
“About €12,000, maybe €15,000”
“And what’s the VAT/GST/sales tax on that?”
“About €2500, maybe €3000”
“And the subsidy’s €2500, so the Government’s not actually giving YOU anything at all – it’s just getting your money out of the bank and back into circulation”
Talk about brainy.
No wonder he’s a professor.
AND a Ph.D.
I’m having some work done in New Zealand by a quantity surveyor.
I found a couple of discrepancies in his initial estimate, so we had a conference call with him and the architect o clarify things and to discuss some other issues which resulted in changes to the original plans.
He makes the changes and emails them through.
Time from the start of the phone call to the email: 2 hours.
Got a bill the other day for $372.22 plus tax.
No indication of times or rates and – thinking that $200 an hour a tad excessive – I asked him to resubmit, given that at least part of the time was down to his errors.
Talk about precious.
Yes, he’d taken all that into consideration and in fact he’d generously reduced his hourly rate from $135 to $105 and worked a total of 3.545 hours on the issue.
3.545 hours.
3 hours. 32 minutes. 42 seconds.
42 SECONDS?
No-one bills with a precision of 18 seconds.
I’ve frequently engaged UK corporate law practices to advise on contract law.
They might charge £5 a minute, but they don’t charge by the second…..
Work it back from the NORMAL rate of $135, though, and you get…… 2.75 hours
I don’t like it when people pad bills.
I like it even less when I’m lied to.
Precisely…
>
You must be logged in to post a comment.